Reply To: Uranus-Pluto square: Technology takes on suicide – 43 replies

About Me Forums Scorpio! Uranus-Pluto square: Technology takes on suicide – 43 replies Reply To: Uranus-Pluto square: Technology takes on suicide – 43 replies

#1848
Michelle Young
Keymaster

Michelle - Orkut shot Michelle YoungOct 8, 2012
I’ve offered the above-noted article in its entirety so those of you who would like to know more about the Tyler Clementi story and what happened back then (2010) can have a starting base to read and a clear understanding of why and who the major players were. I hope it helps.

The US Office of Justice National Institute of Justice offers research, development and evaluation of, among other things, suicide. On their page, I found the following:

Suicide Watch Technologies Could Improve Monitoring, Reduce Staff Time
The suicide rate in jails and prisons has been going down [1], but it remains a troubling problem and traditional suicide watch requires dedicated staffing, taking officers away from
other duties.

An automated suicide warning system is a cost-effective, non-invasive approach to behavior monitoring, and more proactive than waiting for a suicidal attempt to justify the added personnel required for a suicide watch.

NIJ has supported the development of a system, and now is funding an evaluation in an operational facility, that can measure an inmate’s heart rate, breathing rate and body
motions without being attached to the individual. A wall-mounted range controlled radar (RCR) system — originally designed for home security motion detectors — measures subtle motions on the body’s surface caused by heart and lung activity. Alarms are activated when the system detects suspicious changes in heart rate, breathing rate or body motion.

The potential benefits for agencies implementing a suicide watch technology are compelling. Corrections agencies should, of course, review their policies, and any applicable legal issues, before placing inmates under electronic surveillance. Potential benefits include:

** Less obtrusive, less prone to destruction.
A key feature of the device is that it is less obtrusive. Inmates are prone to tamper with or destroy monitoring devices but a device that does not require physical contact with the prisoner could make tampering or destruction less likely.
** Detect disguised suicide attempts.
Correctional officers mistake cleverly disguised suicide attempts as normal behavior.. An automated system could safeguard against human error.
** Provide continuous monitoring.
An inmate under traditional suicide watch typically is checked on by corrections staff every fifteen minutes. Even with this intense effort by corrections facilities, inmates still have ample time to commit or attempt suicide. Monitoring technology can provide continuous surveillance to supplement the visual inspections and alert officers quickly to any attempt.
** Fewer people needed to staff suicide watch.
By installing these devices, prisons may be able to reduce the number of officers needed to monitor prisoners, freeing staff for other corrections tasks.
** Watch more prisoners at risk.
An automated system could be installed to monitor inmates who are at high risk, such as those on suicide watch or new prisoners
awaiting trial.

—About the System
The radar-based system, being developed under an award to GE Global Research Center, consists of:
** “Personal health status” sensors that can be enclosed in a box on the ceiling to remotely and non-invasively monitor inmates’ pulse and breathing.
** Network connections to remote monitors.
** Software designed to interpret motion data and create a decision tree for when to notify officers.
Notes
[1] Suicide and Homicide in State Prisons and Local Jails, Bureau of Justice Statistics, April 2005.

Date Modified: January 12, 2012

Monitoring Inmates – Suicide Watch